Search for: "Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
Power imbalance Hugh Tomlinson QC took issue with the media’s presentation of London as the libel capital of the world. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 3:56 am by INFORRM
Mr Ver was represented by Iain Wilson and Tom Double of Brett Wilson LLP and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Ian Helme of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 4:16 am by INFORRM
David Erdos, University of Cambridge David Smith, UK Deputy Information Commissioner Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Chambers 16:00 – 16:30: Coffee and Refreshments 16:30 – 17:45: Session 4: Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Beyond after Google Spain Prof. [read post]
23 May 2021, 10:09 am by INFORRM
Ms Van Roy was represented by Nigel Tait, Helena Shipman and Katherine Hooley of Carter-Ruck, and Hugh Tomlinson QC and Aidan Wills of Matrix Chambers. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:49 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang
A Matrix team, headed by UKSCBlog editor Hugh Tomlinson QC, is acting for MLA. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Charon QC
The UK Supreme Court Editors: Dan Tench, Oliver Gayner, Anna Caddick & Laura Coogan (Olswang) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder & Anthony Fairclough (Matrix) Site Administrator: Anita Davies [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 11:36 pm by charonqc
Hugh Tomlinson, a QC at Matrix Chambers, said: “This is a welcome reminder of the rigorous tests that have to be satisfied before injunctions are granted. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC from Matrix Chambers and the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism have put together a team lawyers, academics, journalists and others. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 9:04 am by Charon QC
Editors: Dan Tench, Oliver Gayner, Anna Caddick & Laura Coogan (Olswang) Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matthew Ryder & Anthony Fairclough (Matrix) Administrator: Anita Davies UKSC Blog 2. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
One of the barristers present, Hugh Tomlinson QC of Matrix chambers, is also the editor of the Inforrm media blog. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Other contributions included: Claire de Than, law lecturer at City University London on libel defences; Dominic Crossley, partner, Collyer Bristow on reframing the time it takes to get to a libel trial; Andrew Stephenson, senior partner, Carter Ruck on science and libel; Hugh Tomlinson QC, barrister, Matrix Chamber with the practitioner’s view; Gavin Sutter, Queen Mary University with an academic perspective; Professor Alastair Mullis & Dr Andrew… [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
  Chambers and Partners also announced its UK Bar awards 2015 [pdf] with Matrix Chambers winning the award for defamation set of the year, Hugh Tomlinson QC defamation silk of the year, and Catrin Evans defamation junior of the year. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege.   [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:47 am by INFORRM
In deciding whether or not to grant the injunction the Court will first consider whether a reasonable person, in all the circumstances, would regard each item of information as “confidential” or “private”; if satisfied, the Court will then consider whether there is, in any event, some proper justification for publication of the information (for a fuller discussion see Hugh Tomlinson QC’s post ‘Part 1: Privacy Law – the way ahead? [read post]