Search for: "IN RE: Complaint of Judicial Misconduct v." Results 61 - 80 of 267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2020, 4:22 am by SHG
Of course no college Title IX investigator announced to the accused male student, “While you probably didn’t do anything wrong, we’re still going to expel you because you’re a guy and we have to believe survivors, no matter how ridiculous their complaint. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
Regrettably, that risk is present in every case where a defendant is accused of sufficiently serious misconduct, or where a plaintiff sues over allegations of such misconduct. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
New York’s Business Corporation Law (BCL) provides three pathways for non-controlling shareholders to achieve involuntary (judicial) dissolution. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Joseph Scopelitis
Professor Ayres of Yale notes, “[i]n addition to traditional reporting options, the Callisto platform gives survivors a ‘matching option’ of depositing an encrypted, time-stamped complaint into escrow that will be released to the school’s Title IX coordinator for investigation only if another complaint is received accusing the same person. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, a showing of perjury would reduce any judicial concern that the litigation would chill legitimate expert witness opinion testimony, especially in novel contexts. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
. *************************** “You guys think you’re above the law? [read post]
’s liability policy because the complaint alleged willful and intentional misconduct that does not constitute an “accident. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am by Peter Mahler
Court of Appeals (which includes federal courts in New York) is Friedman v Revenue Management, Inc., 38 F3d 668 [2d Cir. 1994], where the court applied Burford abstention to dismiss a complaint seeking judicial dissolution of a New York corporation under Section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law based on shareholder deadlock. [read post]