Search for: "IN RE AMENDMENT TO RULE 2 GOVERNING ADMISSION TO THE PRACTICE OF LAW" Results 61 - 80 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2021, 4:10 am by SHG
“You have to show that there’s this really close nexus between why you’re using race and the outcome you’re seeking,” said Melissa Murray, a professor of law at New York University. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
This duty now exists: in October 2019, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada amended its Model Code rule on competence to include explicit reference to technological competence. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
On the other hand, the careful, persistent, and creative use of a handful of tools will increase the likelihood of success and will help defense counsel practice at the highest level in one of twenty-first century American law’s most trying crucibles. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by William Ford, Margaret Taylor
The Supreme Court held there that federal courts have jurisdiction over a dispute only if it is a case or controversy under Article III, Section 2, of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
  This requirement was aimed at chilling the efforts of itinerant, out-of-state screening physicians, whose conduct came under scrutiny in In re Silica.[11] Daubert, Its Progeny, and Amended Rule of Evidence 702 The Supreme Court’s opinion in Daubert was not only a watershed in the analysis of expert evidence generally but also reflected specific concerns about expert testimony in the area of product liability litigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm by Karlee
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm by Barry Sookman
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:31 pm by Barry Sookman
Rogers Cable Inc (2002), 58 O.R. (3d) 299 (S.C.J.) [2] Re A Debtor (No. 2021 of 1995), [1996] 2 All E.R. 345 (Ch. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am by MOTP
On June 3, 2016, the trial court entered amended findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of the judgment. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
In view of Article 2(2) EPC, national law under Article 139(3) EPC should apply to two identical European patents granted in a situation of internal priority. [read post]
  He and other DRE’s are trained to follow the DRE protocol to:  (1) rule out alcohol as a source of impairment, (2) determine whether the suspect is impaired by something, (3) rule out a medical condition as the source of any observed impairment, (4) if a medical condition is ruled out, render an opinion as to which of 7 categories of drugs is or are causing the impairment, and (5) secure a sample of the person’s blood or urine for… [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 3:16 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In an initial effort to respond to these developments and pressures, EBSA amended the general standards for delivery of required disclosures in 2002 by establishing a regulatory safe harbor for the use of electronic media (the “2002 safe harbor”) under 29 CFR 2520.104b-1(c). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
After deliberations, only 10 of the jury members found that the government had proven its case. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Whereas Rule 64(b) EPC 1973 had required "a statement identifying the decision which is impugned and the extent to which the amendment or cancellation of the decision is requested", Rule 99(1)(b) and (c) EPC only required "an indication of the decision impugned" and "a request defining the subject of the appeal".The letter of 17 March 2015 was not simply a mere debit order; it also contained an indication that it related to the filing of an… [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Fordham 27 (Report 3): DMCA - 20 years later | Fordham 27 (Report 2): IP - Past, Present & Future | Fordham 27 (Report 1): Key Current IP Issues: Reflections & Analysis | Event Report: IPAN World IP Day Celebrations | German Federal Court of Justice refers new case on communication to the public | Non-traditional trademarks and other amendments to the Mexican IP Law (Second Part) | Follow the IPKat page on LinkedIn! [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:24 pm by Francis Pileggi
     Amendments to Court of Chancery Rules of Procedure: The Court of Chancery Rules are modeled after the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which were recently amended. [read post]