Search for: "IN RE E.O."
Results 61 - 73
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 4:48 am
The almost as brilliant and never opaque Bexis pointed out to us that one of our heroes, the Harvard sociobiologist E.O. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:56 pm
(After all, if the President does wish to exempt the VP's Office, he could do so with a stroke of the pen -- as far as I know, there's no statute that requires the VP to comply with the procedures in the E.O. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
They should also give businesses, especially small businesses, the confidence they need to re-open by providing guidance on what the law requires; by recognizing the efforts of businesses to comply with often-complex regulations in complicated and swiftly changing circumstances; and by committing to fairness in administrative enforcement and adjudication. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm
They should also give businesses, especially small businesses, the confidence they need to re-open by providing guidance on what the law requires; by recognizing the efforts of businesses to comply with often-complex regulations in complicated and swiftly changing circumstances; and by committing to fairness in administrative enforcement and adjudication. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:14 am
On July 5, 2012, OFAC has added [SOMALIA] Entries to the Specially Designated Nationals List (SDN List): The following [SOMALIA] entries have been added to OFAC’s SDN list: GOITOM, Taeme Abraham (a.k.a. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:53 am
Removing the designation would give Iranian leaders a face-saving means of selling the deal domestically after suffering the perceived humiliation of the U.S. withdrawal and sanctions re-imposition despite its (at the time) good faith compliance. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:15 pm
Here is a summary of the major policies and executive orders that have changed or re-shaped immigration law: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States and Border Security E.O. 13767 On January 25, 2016, the President signed the executive orders “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,” and “Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements,” in which the President called for (1) the immediate planning, funding,… [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 6:43 pm
The United States has been supportive but distant from the development of what is emerging as a consensus position on the expectations of business (and their supply chains) in the context of human rights effects of their economic activities. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 11:24 am
Over the weekend, VICE published a story entitled “Exclusive: Snowden Tried to Tell NSA About Surveillance Concerns, Documents Reveal. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:26 am
The judgments of the Grand Chamber of the EU Court of Justice in Privacy International (C-623/17) and the joined cases of La Quadrature du Net (C-511/18 and C-512/18) and Ordre des barreax francophones et Germanophone (C-520/18) landed with a reverberating thud on the morning of 6 October 2020. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
The HIV ban removal will be remembered as a historic decision, through this final rule, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within the U.S. [read post]
