Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF CROSS" Results 61 - 80 of 380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by judgesudderth
  Prior to retrial of the case, plaintiffs sought to have the sanctions reinstated. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs appeal, and the Ofshtein defendants cross-appeal. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:33 am
., decided 9/16/2008)In per curiam opinions dated September 16, 2008, the Second Department suspended Nassau County no-fault attorneys Edward Shapiro and Jason Moroff from the practice of law for a period of six months effective October 16, 2008, with leave to apply for reinstatement at the end of their suspensions.Edward Shapiro, PC , attorneys Shapiro and Moroff were found to have filed affirmations, verifications and attestations bearing their signatures that they had not actually signed… [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:12 pm by admin
Unfortunately, you cannot get your revoked driver’s license restored or reinstated in California. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:38 am by David Oxenford
  The Commission also apparently kicked the can down the road on all other multiple ownership matters – not changing the local TV ownership rules or amending the newspaper broadcast cross-ownership restrictions, instead deciding to further consider any modification of the rules. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am by MBettman
It held the license agreements and activities of utility company employees were insufficient as a matter of law to defeat the exclusivity prong of adverse possession, and remanded the matter for trial. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 10:02 am by Matt C. Bailey
  Upon being sued in 2008, the defendant filed a UCL class action cross complaint, alleging that the “Notice of Intent to Dispose of Motor Vehicle” used by the creditor in 2003 to initiate the entire process was legally defective under the Rees-Levering Motor Vehicle Sales and Finance Act, and therefore would not, as a matter of law, support a deficiency judgment. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
 The Supreme Court held that the prosecutor’s evidence and cross examination of the psychologist provided sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict, reversing the Court of Appeals and reinstating the trial court’s judgment. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 8:24 am
If the court determines that the evidence was admissible, the controlled dangerous substance conviction should be reinstated. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:39 pm
  At this point, however, as a practical matter that political hit may be hard to avoid no matter what happens. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 2:40 pm by Amy Howe
” Returning asylum seekers to Mexico under the MPP, she told the justices, requires a “massive cross-border program,” with ev [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This Court then remitted the matter to Supreme Court to address that part of the cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the estate cause of action on the ground that plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege damages on that cause of action (id. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:35 am
There's a different line that can be crossed between individuals when religion is an issue: It's called defamation. [read post]