Search for: "In re Dow Jones & Co." Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2009, 8:05 pm
"We first tested ground beef and now we're testing trim. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:51 pm
Dow Jones reporters  Laura Kreutzer and Shasha Dai summarize the new PE line thus:   "As regulators gear up to monitor private pools of capital more, private equity firms have a message they really, really want to get across: we're not hedge funds. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Firestone Tire &;amp; Rubber Co., 863 P.2d 795, 822-23 (Cal. 1993). [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
On the day the plan was announced, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 4.6%.[5] On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the “Stimulus Act”), which provides $787 billion in government spending and tax cuts and also codifies (and in some cases expands) the Treasury Department’s restrictions on executive compensation.[6] Under the Stimulus Act, recipients of TARP funds must… [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 12:49 pm
In a joint statement issued Friday, the companies — Dow Chemical Co. and Rohm & Haas Co. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:25 am
Campbell is a director of Dow Jones &;amp; Co., publisher of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 4:37 pm
He proposes the creation of a Dow Jones cable TV channel and a video Web site called WSJVideo. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
We're warning you, if you're not a lawyer, then you'll find this post very boring. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 5:01 pm
(Boutrous frequently represents Dow Jones, publisher of the WSJ.) [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 4:44 pm
Looking to free up funds for its $5 billion bid for Dow Jones, News Corp. plans to sell nine of its Fox-affiliated television stations. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:01 pm
(Gibson Dunn does legal work for Dow Jones, the owner of and The Wall Street Journal.) [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Accord, e.g., In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 193 F.3d 781, 789-90 (3d Cir. 1999); In re Shigellosis Litigation, 647 N.W.2d 1, 10 (Minn. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
Since this was a non-EU, non-Brussels Convention case, an application to serve outside the jurisdiction of England was necessary, which raised the question of whether 'a real and substantial tort ha[d] been committed within the jurisdiction': Kroch v Rossell [1937] 1 All ER 725, Chadha v Dow Jones & Co Inc [1999] EMLR 724, and Civil Procedure Rules 6.20(8). [read post]