Search for: "In Re Doe, III"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am
The basic principles can be stated with almost disarming ease: Pending hourly-fee cases are not “assets” of the law firm, since a law firm does not “own” a client or engagement (see In re Thelen LLP, 24 NY3d 16, 29 [2014]). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Re (a), there are plenty of grounds for resisting CoS pretenses that state governments can or should entirely determine this process. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:30 am
Not every broadly worded statute does. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 6:13 am
Part 2 could not be re-disclosed by one team member to other team members unless the disclosure was specifically allowed under 42 C.F.R. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am
What does Loper Bright mean? [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: An Article III back o' the hand to you. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:51 am
What we’re seeing in case after case is that there are two separate conceptions of the separation of powers emerging in the Roberts Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:50 am
Richard Re criticized that move here. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:15 am
Since this case does implicate the Seventh Amendment, we next consider whether the “public rights” exception to Article III jurisdiction applies. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm
She turns away all emergency petitions on the shadow docket (unless they're from the Fifth Circuit). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:07 pm
III. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:08 pm
But without reference to any constitutional text or history to guide what does or does not qualify as a public right, that view has (unsurprisingly) proven wholly unworkable. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
And so does Justice Gorsuch. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
III. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
One does not develop a help desk from the bottom up--nor necessarily with a view to enlarging the primacy of human rights holders who tend to bear the consequences of adverse human rights impacts.[12] Instead, it tends to be more efficient to target those collective organs into which positive responsibility for the care and protection of human rights harms bearers authority are vested. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
I'm not even sure they're reading from the same book. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
They’re both thoughtful and independent; they each bring a lot to the Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 6:31 am
Posted by Arthur B. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
More importantly, Part III is persuasive and does pretty much what I predicted it would. [read post]
