Search for: "In re John W. (1996)" Results 61 - 80 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" Bose acknowledged that it did not re-label or make any alteration to the products, apart from the technical repair. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Welch was convicted of first-degree murder in 1996. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:18 am
A nonprecedential case, In re John A., 2003 WL 2008173 (Cal. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 11:10 am by Miriam Seifter
Justice Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts pressed Fisher a bit on the reach of his position – what if the reasons were provided a few days later? [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Charlotte Butash, Hilary Hurd
While new revelations about Trump’s call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenksy likely will emerge over the coming months (like in former National Security Adviser John Bolton’s upcoming book), the legal debate over when impeachment is appropriate will subside until this country is faced with another potential impeachment. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[Said w/a straight face, if you’re wondering.](1) Civil tort law can be important to law enforcement, which is necessarily limited. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 12:43 pm by Berin Szóka, Ari Cohn
This appears to be the latest argument advanced by those criticizing Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996—sometimes known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Assessment in Health Care 264, 271 (1996) “Such data dredging must be avoided and subgroup analyses should be limited to those that are specified a priori in the trial protocol. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:07 am
Carnell Professor of Psychology at Temple University and is currently director of the John D. and Catherine T. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
If they think they're going to fool people with this, they are badly mistaken. [read post]