Search for: "JAMES v. HOLDER et al"
Results 61 - 78
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am
WANDA GREENWOOD ET AL. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:24 am
And finally, no mention was made of the 2009 Certificate of Relief From Disabilities which Caputo had received from his sentencing judge in 2009....Interestingly, counsel first argues that the United States Supreme Court’s recent interpretation of the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution in two cases, District of Columbia, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:31 am
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 7:54 am
New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:36 am
The Prime Minister of Canada et al., Federal Court Judge James W. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(Builds on scholars such as Sean Seymore and Ben Roin; see also Krieger et al. on drug novelty. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Decided on November 25, 2024 No. 72 [*1]Jeffrey Colt et al., Respondents, v New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al., Appellants. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Decided on November 25, 2024 No. 72 [*1]Jeffrey Colt et al., Respondents, v New Jersey Transit Corporation, et al., Appellants. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
ATT Mobility, et al. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Vol. 2, No. 22, August 2, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
