Search for: "Jane Chong"
Results 61 - 80
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
The Fate of the Third-Party Doctrine by Michael Bahar, David Cook, Varun Shingari, Curtis Arnold In Defense of the Mosaic Theory by Paul Rosenzweig Phones Move--and So Should the Law by Susan Landau The Lawfare Podcast: Orin Kerr on Carpenter with Benjamin Wittes The Carpenter Argument: Quick Video Reactions on Twitter and Facebook Live by Orin Kerr And let’s not forget the DreamHost search warrant controversy: DreamHost Document Summaries Justice Department Fights Web Hosting… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
Ben, Quinta Jurecic, and Jane Chong liveblogged Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am
Apropos of Charleston, Jane Chong weighed in with a detailed study of both relevant statutes and official statements categorizing domestic terrorism as opposed to hate crimes. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 12:20 pm
Jane Chong liveblogged Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s testimony before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:29 am
Jane Chong announced the launch of a new Lawfare resource page collecting developments and news on what’s known about L’Affaire Russe. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In Lawfare last month, Alice Hill and Jane Chong referenced the National Intelligence Council’s examination of the threat of climate change that. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am
Then there was Wednesday, when Jane Chong, Quinta, Susan, Matt, and Ben put forth initial reactions to the appointment of Bob Mueller as Special Counsel on the Russia Connection matter. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Jane Chong, a Ford Foundation fellow spending some time with Lawfare, wrote her inaugural post about a recent dismissal of a former GTMO detainee’s lawsuit against the DOD. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In other L’Affaire Russe news, on Tuesday morning Rosenstein testified before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee on the Justice Department’s proposed F2018 budget, which Jane Chong liveblogged; many of the questions ended up being about Russia and Mueller. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
Jane Chong analyzed whether § 1373 of the Immigration and Nationality Act unconstitutionally commandeers the states. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 9:52 am
Jane Chong discussed whether Devin Nunes thinks he really “recused” himself from HPSCI’s Russian investigation. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
Jane Chong asked how the DOJ does and should handle pre-election disclosures about investigations. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:19 am
Bobby initially wrote about the case when the criminal complaint was unsealed last October, and Jane Chong linked to the indictment here. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 1:08 pm
Jane Chong posted key documents related to a Justice Department order to obtain information on visitors to an anti-Trump organizing website. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:27 am
ICYMI: This Weekend, on Lawfare Jane Chong analyzed reports that White House chief of staff Reince Priebus asked FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and FBI Director James Comey to refute the New York Times’ reporting of links between senior members of the Trump campaign and Russian agents publicly. [read post]
13 May 2017, 8:51 am
Lawfare liveblogged both events, and Jane Chong summarized the oral argument. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jane Chong and Benjamin Wittes argued that the time has come for Congress to open a formal impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
Jane Chong argued that inaccurate reporting on President Trump’s sanctuary cities executive order and policy compounds the misinformation problem. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:53 am
Hill and Jane Chong argued that the Trump administration should take climate change seriously as a national security threat. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:20 pm
In the wake of the Charleston shooting, Jane Chong considered the legal and cultural distinctions between hate crimes and domestic terrorism. [read post]
