Search for: "John Doe v. Jane Doe"
Results 61 - 80
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2014, 8:03 am
Nicoletti of Nicoletti & Associates PLLCDefendant: John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.213.184.255Cause: Copyright InfringementCourt: Southern District of IndianaJudge: Judge Jane Magnus-StinsonReferred To: Magistrate Judge Mark J. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:28 pm
., d/b/a Bazz and Crue and X4B Lounge; D2; and John Doe and Jane Doe, for all those similarly situated, to with a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment was filed by Defendant Prince George’s County. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:18 am
After John and Jane Doe had sex in a dormitory bathroom, she accused him of unwanted sexual assault. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:42 am
From Friday's Seventh Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:15 pm
JOHN/JANE DOE EMPLOYEE, ET AL., DEFENDANT CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-25-DLB-JGW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, NORTHERN DIVISION2011 U.S. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:35 pm
Judicial Watch, the public interest organization that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in favor of Judicial Watch client and 9/11 widower “John Doe” in his “conspiracy and wrongful death” lawsuit against the Islamic State of Afghanistan (John Doe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 2:20 pm
Nor does she have a revealing track record of legal scholarship. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:15 am
While in the National Archives, Plaintiffs were subject to a pattern of ongoing misconduct by federal government officials, specifically National Archives security officers, Defendants John Does and Jane Doe, who targeted Plaintiffs and intentionally chilled their religious speech and expression by requiring Plaintiffs to remove or cover their attire because of their pro-life messages.6. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
John Doe and Jane Doe, 2014 FC 161, provides insight into the collision of Norwich Orders, means used to identify unknown infringers, and the growing business model of copyright trolls giving rise for the Courts to be more mindful of playing a role in potentially abusive behaviour of the trolls. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
It began with an anonymous court filing pitting “John Doe” against “Jane Doe. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm
FERN HART, individually; MICHAEL KENNEDY, individually, and JANE and JOHN DOES 1-20, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants, Appellees, Cross-Appellants. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Yarbrough (D.N.M.): … Plaintiff filed her complaint under the pseudonym "Jane Doe. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am
From Doe v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:20 pm
I've recently started looking into anonymous "John Doe" (or "Jane Doe") litigation; generally speaking, people are presumptively required to sue in their own names, but sometimes courts allow them to sue anonymously. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:47 am
A few weeks ago, however, an Indiana federal court—in Shoun v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Imagine the following: John Doe owns a house that he typically rents out but was currently empty. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:23 am
This is the issue in the 2009, San Antonio Court of Appeals opinion decided in Irwin v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
Similarly, in Doe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:48 am
. [* * *] From Friday's [June 28, 2019] Seventh Circuit decision in Doe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:24 am
Bd. of Edn. v. [read post]
