Search for: "John T. Minor, V"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2023, 3:30 am
– John Jenkins [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:13 pm
Once again the focus of the lecture was on litigants in landmark twentieth-century cases – this time, the petitioners in the 1969 case Tinker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 9:46 pm
In Microsoft v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:52 pm
(Orin Kerr) Next week, the Supreme Court will be hearing oral argument in Ashcroft v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
From Doe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
As I explain in the column, the dissent in the Israeli case argues that laws benefiting minorities shouldn't be subject to judicial invalidation because the majority that is disadvantaged can use the political process to gain redress, and thus the heavy artillery of judicial review should be reserved for laws that disadvantage minorities. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Perry, same-sex marriage, and Gill v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
Morrow Porter Vermitsky & Taylor, PLLC, by John C. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 1:59 pm
The Court will explore in Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
Yet Congress wasn’t done. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
’’ Yates v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:54 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In Florence v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
And Chief Justice John G. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:51 am
Voting isn't just about electing candidates. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: John Stuart Mill distilled what the Founders knew all along: majorities harnessing the power of the state are often willing to trammel minorities’ rights. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:49 am
Tomorrow in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Arguing Counsel John K. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 1:01 am
Underwood and Doe v. [read post]
