Search for: "King v. Innovation Books"
Results 61 - 80
of 106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” In today’s terminology we may say that the purpose is to lead to maximum productivity and innovation Khanna is correct on one point: the view of the Copyright Clause he disagrees with is indeed common. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Tex., Filed 2007): Beneficial Innovations owns U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog) Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows support for music piracy:… [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 3:21 pm
., Farmland Protection Alliance v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Jury - http://bit.ly/SParA8 (Dan Levine) Apple v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:30 am
The problem with Grisham is that his books repeatedly have a critical plot point where somebody bribes a state court judge to decide a federal removal motion some way, and it just ruins the book for me when the author gets a federal jurisdiction question so wrong. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
In undertaking this inquiry, I revisit several examples from Bradley’s excellent book as well as several others not discussed to illustrate the erosion of constitutional safeguards primarily to shield against executive tyranny and misconduct. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
Carl Ulrich at Penn has a nice book, free on his website: Design: Creation of Artifacts in Society. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 am
Justice Michel Bastarache, of the Supreme Court of Canada, criticized that court for the 2004 decisions in the Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:53 pm
Fox News v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Nielsen [and] Pars Equality Center v Pompeo (Pars Equality). [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
Nielsen [and] Pars Equality Center v Pompeo (Pars Eqaulity). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
March 12, 2010); King v. [read post]
