Search for: "Laird v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 93
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2007, 8:16 am
But to answer the question, the government relied on Laird, which basically goes back to state secrets and the plaintiffs illustrated for the court the concrete harm they indeed have suffered, which the government has never argued against. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:17 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The plaintiffs’ claims thus amounted only to “[a]llegations of a subjective ‘chill’” of the kind that failed to supply standing in Laird v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Laird and (indirectly) in Marbury; a famously slippery opinion by Chief Justice Marshall.1804:  Jefferson is reelected with a large majority in Congress and confirms his party's preeminence.1828:  Jackson wins the Presidency and creates the modern Democratic Party.1830:  Congress enacts the Removal Act to "assist" the Cherokee Nation's departure from Georgia, which is fiercely opposed by a coalition that becomes the Whig Party.1832:  The Supreme Court… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Laird v Tatum (1972) (noting that a plaintiff's fear that an "agency might in the future take some other and additional action detrimental to [plaintiff]" was not enough to establish injury-in-fact). [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
In the thinly-reasoned opinion of Stuart v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Danielle Citron
 Questions about the Court’s contemporary recusal practice date back to Chief Justice Rehnquist’s decision to participate in the Laird v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]