Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 61 - 80
of 16,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2024, 12:11 am
Written by Tarasha Gupta, student, Jindal Global Law School, Sonipat (India) and Saloni Khanderia, Professor, Jindal Global Law School In its recent judgment in Shiju Jacob Varghese v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 10:51 pm
Moving on to the Court’s next opinion, in State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am
”) [4] Frye v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 6:05 am
” Note: Readers may be interested in our South Africa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of McManus v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:58 am
Savoy v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm
Red Cross v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
(Tribal Gaming; Certification of Parties; Question of State Law) Kwate v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
Meanwhile, the "invasion" issue will be before the Fifth Circuit again in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
The law is still unsettled. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
They make cross-border litigation easier in Western Australia. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:03 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 1:31 pm
In Gay Law Students Ass'n v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:13 am
Walmart v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
” See State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Headly, J.), entered August 28, 2023, which granted respondent's cross-motion to dismiss as untimely the petition challenging the agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition reinstated. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Headly, J.), entered August 28, 2023, which granted respondent's cross-motion to dismiss as untimely the petition challenging the agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition reinstated. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:30 pm
This marks a huge difference vis-à-vis the dictum of the General Court, not only in this case, but also in the SRB v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 9:34 am
The case of Greene v. [read post]
