Search for: "Loomis v. Loomis"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
I was Arrested for Grand Larceny In New York: Challenging Property Value to Lessen Criminal Exposure
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
I was Arrested for Grand Larceny In New York: Challenging Property Value to Lessen Criminal Exposure
5 Apr 2016, 8:12 am
Furthermore, ‘[c]onclusory statements and rough estimates of value are not sufficient’ to establish the value of the property (People v Loomis, 56 AD3d 1046, 1047; see People v Walker, 119 AD3d 1402, 1402-1403; People v Pallagi, 91 AD3d 1266, 1269). [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 9:27 am
Nippon Shinyaku Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Clover Valley Foundation et al. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Clover Valley Foundation et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:03 am
” Finally, the justices asked the federal government to file a brief conveying its views on Loomis v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:01 pm
Two of our California cases have had a big impact on the way schools in that state and nationwide address the pervasive problem of anti-gay harassment: Loomis v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
However, a 1979 case called Hackbart v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Loomis, involving this issue. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
See also “The IARC Process is Broken” (May 4, 2016). [2] See Dana Loomis, Kathryn Guyton, Yann Grosse, Béatrice Lauby-Secretan, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Véronique Bouvard, Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa, Neela Guha, Heidi Mattock, Kurt Straifon behalf of the IARC Monograph Working Group, “Carcinogenicity of drinking coffee, mate, and very hot beverages,” Lancet Oncology (2016 in press). [3] IARC, “Coffee, tea, mate, methylxanthines and… [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:23 pm
The case of Loomis v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 10:55 am
See Loomis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
V. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
See also Cupek v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Reese v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Reese v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Reese v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
Fourth Circuit Rules Against North Carolina State Professor Who Spoke Out Against Diversity Policies
8 Jul 2023, 4:26 am
For example, in Rankin v. [read post]
