Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 61 - 80
of 20,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 6:52 am
Dastarteaches that “[t]he words of the Lanham Act should not be stretched to cover matters that are typically of no consequence to consumers. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 8:38 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0106; DA 09-0107, 2009 MT 279N, IN THE MATTER OF B.L. and C.T., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:58 pm
The 16(b) plaintiff does not know insider trading has occurred and won't know unless he or she is told. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 7:49 pm
Nice try by B of A's PR flacks, though. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
On 7 December, the Board of Appeal posted a communication on their website wherein the decision in case T 1063/18 on the patentability of plants was summarized (see here). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 12:17 am
Hot News: Communication from the BoAs (link):Decision in case T 1063/18 on the patentability of plants7 December 2018Case T 1063/18 concerns the appeal by the applicant against the decision of the examining division to refuse European patent application no. 12 756 468.0 (publication no. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 9:48 am
It’s wrong and we won’t be bullied. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:18 am
Posted By: Robert B. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:00 am
It is infringement to copy audio samples from B-movies. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Bad faith is shown when a prosecutor places before the jury incompetent and prejudicial matter, either by injecting his own opinions and beliefs or by insinuating facts unsupported by evidence. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 8:56 am
Don’t wait until the end of the month or the end of the matter. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
(b) does any act of extraction and/or re-utilisation by that party occur (i) in A only (ii) in B only; or (iii) in both A and B? [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:47 am
Respondent’s further arguments regarding matters other than the legal sufficiency of the claims were superfluous.Respondent’s arguments were in the nature of defenses, but the standard for considering a Rule 12(B)(6) motion whether the complaint states a plausible claim for relief. [read post]
The Rule 54(b) Trap: Dealing with Non-final Orders in Cases with Multiple Claims or Multiple Parties
15 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
Appellate courts simply do not have subject-matter jurisdiction to consider the merits of an appeal where the order being appealed from is not final. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
The post Conclusory Legal Opinions of Patentee’s Expert Not Enough to Prevent 12(b)(6) Dismissal appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
While this 6th installment of the Ten Legal Mistakes Made by Start Ups examines the "83(b) Election," the underlying theme is the need to engage an accountant who understands your tax profile and a lawyer who understands the accountant.Myth #6: "I don't need to be concerned with tax issues because this is just a start up. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Robert T. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Robert T. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
Robert T. [read post]
