Search for: "Mathews v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2015, 2:41 am by ligitsec
In a significant defeat for the administration, United States District Court Judge Rosemary M. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, if the Kalin decision allows a lower court to use its discretion to accept a police officer's assertions of their training and experience and the other allegations contained in the complaint, without a description of the substance seized, and declare them to be legally sufficient in all cases, then Kalin, as well as Jahron S., is inconsistent with the court's obligation to protect the constitutional right to procedural due process discussed by the United States… [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" In Hamdi v Rumsfeld, the United States Supreme Court acknowledged that there is a tension "between the autonomy that the Government asserts is necessary in order to pursue effectively a particular goal and the process that a citizen contends he is due before he is deprived of a constitutional right as held in Mathews v Eldridge. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The second Mathews factor requires the Criminal Court to examine the risk of erroneous deprivation of the interest at stake as a result of the State's procedures and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute safeguards with respect to that interest. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In 1979, the United States Supreme Court in Addington v Texas held that constitutional due process required the government to prove two statutory preconditions by clear and convincing evidence before a court could commit an individual to a mental institution: (1) that the person sought to be committed is mentally ill; and (2) that such person requires hospitalization for his own welfare and protection of others. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Matt Danzer
To evaluate this, the court runs through the familiar balancing-of-interests test articulated in the landmark case Mathews v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
Applying Mathews v Eldrige’s deprivation of rights analysis, Judge Brown considered the likelihood of erroneous deprivation. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am by Robert Chesney
Holder that continues the slow dismantling of the United States No Fly List. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:19 am by Benjamin Wittes
The Fifth Amendment cases involve a a Mathews v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
Clement insists that the balancing test in Mathews v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 4:57 am by Kinga Tibori-Szabó
As regards domestic law, while President Obama acknowledged the paramount importance of due process, the WP trivialized (on pp. 5-6) the Mathews v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm by Margaret Wood
  The origin of this doctrine was hammered out in a 1908 United States Supreme Court case, Winters v. [read post]