Search for: "Matter of Rotunda" Results 61 - 80 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm by Melanie Fontes
Supreme Court on Civil Matters In the only instance we have (to date) of a sitting president being subject to lawsuits while sitting as president is the case Clinton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Ron Rotunda summed up it nicely: “Geoff Shepard should look for work as a scriptwriter for the “X Files. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:58 am by Todd Zywicki
  That has nothing to do with Smith’s underlying claim against Marshall’s estate, which is properly a matter of state law. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:37 am by Michael Froomkin
Anti-scale fencing — the kind erected around the White House during the Black Lives Matter protests — would have stopped any of this from happening. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 7:50 am by Sheppard Mullin
TOGA’s motivation, which was articulated only as the matter reached the courts, was that it wished to create space for additional food concessions in the rotunda. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Shea Denning
We hope that last week’s educational experience provokes thought and that it recharges these judicial officials by reminding them about why their work matters. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:45 am
  The problem will not be ordinary citizens storming the capital rotunda to push their fat butts into seats in one chamber or another. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm by Lorna Jaynes
Still less will the moral disapprobation of a group or class of citizens suffice, no matter how large the majority that shares that view. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:43 am
I will also bring the matter up with as many colleagues as I can in United States law schools. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
There, on the outskirts of the famous rotunda, Bailey accosted and started haranguing me about Executive Law § 63(12). [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:42 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If the majority should rule, why does it matter whether they have a 51-49 or a [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm by Richard Primus
  As a matter of constitutional doctrine, the bar on double jeopardy applies to criminal proceedings only. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 3:54 am by SHG
Why did cops readily fire OS gas, rubber bullets and flashbangs at crowds of mostly peaceful protesters in Portland while they stood aside open doors leading to the Rotunda? [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 4:56 pm by Kevin
And if that GPS data shows that at the time of posting you were, let’s say, inside the Capitol Rotunda or down the hall from Nancy Pelosi’s office, where it is illegal for you to be without authorization, that’s bad for you. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although I strongly disagree with Professor Rotunda’s reading of the evidence and his conclusions, I can at least respect his fundamental concern. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Mueller or his successor in the matter would respond that the self-pardon is invalid. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
"Inordinancy" is not, I think, a matter of time but of focus. [read post]