Search for: "McMahon v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
In 1987 the United States Supreme Court decided in the Shearson v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 1:52 pm
United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003), and Justice Breyer's opinion for the Court does not actually use the word "nasty. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:31 am
In support of its proposal, PIABA cites the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
McMahon). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
United States A jury has awarded bakery owner David Gibson damages of $11 million against Oberlin College which had accused Gibsons Bakery of having a history of racial profiling and discriminatory treatment. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
FELDMAN and FELDMAN LAW GROUP, Defendants.11 Civ. 1396 (CM) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
In the United States, “there is not one single case adopting any form of prosecutorial immunity” until 1896. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
Golden advances these allegations on behalf of an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who have declared bankruptcy since 2005 across the United States, with loans originated or serviced by the Defendants. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:51 am
But as the Appellate Division recognized, the United States Supreme Court has consistently held that an arresting officer’s subjective intent, however determined, offers no basis for negating an objectively valid arrest. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
Ofcom stated that the financial penalty was issued due to the “seriousness and repeated nature of this breach,” and will require the broadcaster to publish a statement of its findings on a date determined by the regulator. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:00 am
Colleen McMahon, The Law of Unintended Consequences: Shockwaves in the Lower Courts After Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
