Search for: "Miller v. Municipal Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2025, 3:23 pm
The recent Town of Mancos v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
California v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:30 am
In Knox Couty v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 8:22 pm
Two more states held Alabama v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 2:00 am
" The Appellate Division sustained the lower court's ruling, observing that the Court of Appeals holding in Schenectady Police Benevolent Association v Public Employment Relations Board, 85 NY2d 480, that a municipality could require police officers receiving General Municipal Law 207-c benefits to undergo corrective surgery "under appropriate circumstances ... where reasonable," did not apply in Kauffman's situation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:16 am
Miller v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:22 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:29 pm
The 1997 ruling in East York v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
The Committee For Re-evaluation of the T-Line Loop, et al v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:53 am
Louisiana, the recently dismissed case in which the Court had agreed to decide whether its ruling in Miller v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 pm
This Court held last Term in Berger v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:55 am
” Miller v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"***The Appellate Division characterized the Applicant's notice of claim as constituting "at best a plea for reconsideration" which effort "neither tolled the Statute of Limitations nor began anew the time within which review could be sought," citing Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
"***The Appellate Division characterized the Applicant's notice of claim as constituting "at best a plea for reconsideration" which effort "neither tolled the Statute of Limitations nor began anew the time within which review could be sought," citing Miller v McGough, 97 AD2d 416. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm
Lampert (2014) and Miller v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Miller, the Supreme Court's last major gun control case; and Orin Kerr weighs in here on the discussion of the Court and the 2008 Election. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
DeStefano and Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
