Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,050
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
The Complaint wrote that Dial – an entity with more than 400 shareholder/drivers – was “once one of the leading black car corporate limousine services in the New York City metropolitan area,” but its business model was “decimated” by the recent “proliferation of app-based car services such as Uber and Lyft. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
"The pipeline, plaintiffs claim, is designed to exclude Black and Latinx students from the City's prime educational opportunities. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm
It also has special advantages for minority groups, including Blacks. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The list here is impressive and includes: People v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 5:01 am
In Doe v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 12:05 pm
The fact that your parents are Black, White, or Hispanic says nothing about how good an applicant you are. [read post]
2 May 2024, 11:56 am
It also has special advantages for minority groups, including Blacks. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:19 pm
Sadly, since 2022’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
” Pennsylvania: Statutory Default Provisions Codifying “Pick Your Partner” Principle Defeat Claims by Assignee of 50% LLC Membership Interest If the court’s decision in DiDonato can be likened to an easy basketball layup, the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s recent decision in Larikov, LLC v Cao (read here) equates to a slam dunk. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court’s precedent in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:04 am
–Tejon v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:10 am
Casella v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
See com Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:08 pm
Back in the 1917 case of Buchanan v. [read post]