Search for: "Murphy v. Cole"
Results 61 - 80
of 152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2009, 8:52 am
In Naranjo v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:00 pm
In Ybarra v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
’ ” (Murphy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 10:44 am
In that sense, the opinion reminds me of Murphy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:14 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1105, 1113 (Murphy)), the Court of Appeal concluded that employers are not obligated to ensure that meal breaks are taken. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
In another recent wage and hour case, Murphy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:26 pm
Murphy, 984 F.2d 196, 199 (7th Cir.1993)). [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:29 pm
The Court then explained its holding in light of Murphy v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:21 pm
(C.D.Cal. 2008) 249 F.R.D. 580, 585 (Brown), quoting Murphy v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:00 am
This was finally settled by the California Supreme Court's Murphy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 6:21 am
On Friday, in Hill v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 9:22 am
Cal. 2008) (applying Murphy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
There is quite a bit to absorb in Jaimez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:40 am
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., No. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:11 pm
The case in question is Murphy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:50 am
” See Murphy v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 7:47 am
The Supreme Court did so in the Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:09 pm
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1094]. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:53 am
See United Parcel Service Wage and Hour Cases, __ Cal.App.4th __ (2011).With regard to meal and rest periods, the Court rejected the employer’s argument that the California Supreme Court’s analysis in Murphy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
