Search for: "Nathaniel Persily"
Results 61 - 80
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2008, 6:50 pm
. * * * Nathaniel Persily, a Columbia Law School professor, said registration fraud is very different from actual voter fraud, which occurs at the polls. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 1:59 pm
(Nathaniel Persily, the Stanford law professor who was the author of one of the briefs cited by the government, described himself as “outraged” that his work was “being misrepresented” by the government.) [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:04 am
On February 19, the state Supreme Court published a new election map of House districts drawn by Nathaniel Persily, a Stanford Law school professor. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:04 pm
Research conducted recently by Stephen Ansolabehere of MIT and Nathaniel Persily and Jamal Greene of Columbia Law School found that 58 percent of Americans thought it very or somewhat important for the Supreme Court to exhibit "empathy" in judging. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 2:14 pm
There's a new study (by Nathaniel Persily and Stephen Ansolabehere) that says people decide whether they approve of the Court based on whether they like the outcomes of the cases, which suggests that an effective way for the Court to get respect would be simply to provide the outcomes people want. 4. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:26 am
"The survey is the Constitutional Attitudes Survey by Nathaniel Persily of Columbia and Stephen Ansolabehere of Harvard. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:42 am
Nathaniel Persily, guest-posting on both Balkanization and Volokh, presents the results of a recent survey, which he (and others) designed to measure opinion on constitutional questions, including interpretive methodology and the appropriateness of empathy in Supreme Court decision-making. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:19 am
At Slate, Nathaniel Persily writes that the decision may put longstanding campaign contribution limits and bans on "soft" money contributions in jeopardy. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:39 pm
The Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections ProjectThe Healthy Elections initiative was initiated by renowned elections experts Professor Nathaniel Persily (Stanford) and Charles Stewart III (MIT) to ensure integrity, safety, and equal access in the 2020 election. [read post]
1 May 2013, 3:17 pm
The Table of Contents appears below:IntroductionNathaniel Persily, Gillian E. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:53 pm
Recent survey data compiled by Stephen Ansolabehere and Nathaniel Persily as part of a general study of public attitudes on constitutional issues sheds new light on public attitudes towards Kelo. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 1:52 pm
“There is absolutely no distinction between those states that have bans on corporate electioneering and those that do not,” says Columbia Professor Nathaniel Persily (an election law authority). [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 6:50 pm
Nathaniel Persily of Stanford Law School found that 40% of Americans say they have "lost faith in democracy. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
Stephen Ansolabehere, Nathaniel Persily, and Charles Stewart concluded in their study of the 2008 presidential election that, compared to 2004, white Democratic voters in the states covered by Section 4(b) were less likely to vote for Barack Obama in 2008 than white Democrats in noncovered states. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Nathaniel Persily at the Stanford Lawyer, Rick Hasen at Slate (who also notes an error in Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court at his Election Law Blog), Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, and Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:06 am
Nathaniel Persily sums it up: "If online anonymity is the cause of many of the democracy-related ills of social media, then disclosure might be the best disinfectant. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
Nathaniel Persily – 1 Promoted Comment So much has been written about Citizens United and yet so much more remains to be said. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, with stories here and here; Danielle Blevins of Talk Media News; Tony Mauro of The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required); and Michael Bobelian at Forbes; Commentary on the Evenwel ruling comes from Alan Morrison at The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, who notes that yesterday’s decision will not “ameliorate gerrymandering, but the opposite result would likely have increased its… [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 11:55 am
As I did last year, I'm publishing an early draft of the discussion notes I've prepared for teaching some of the major cases of the Supreme Court Term. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
As Stanford Law Professor Nathaniel Persily writes in the Introduction to a 2008 book on public opinion and the Supreme Court, Supreme Court decisions can legitimate a view, but there are three other possibilities: high court rulings could have no impact on public opinion; they could spark backlash; or they could polarize public opinion. [read post]
