Search for: "Paul Ohm"
Results 61 - 80
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 1:05 pm
Paul Ohm, an associate professor at the University of Colorado Law School, will begin Aug. 27 as senior policy adviser for consumer protection and competition issues at the FTC’s Office of Policy Planning. [read post]
9 May 2012, 3:21 pm
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Daren Orzechowski, FTC, Myspace, Paul Ohm, Privacy, Social media, Social Networking Websites, White & Case [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:45 am
“The worst part is they sell this extremely creepy intrusion as a great boon to your life because they can tailor services to your needs,” said Paul Ohm, an associate professor at the University of Colorado Law School in Boulder who specializes in information privacy and computer crime. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:30 am
Guest speakers include: David Kappos, Don Rosenberg, John Thorne, Paul Ohm, Bernard Chao, and many others. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:34 am
[3] Paul Ohm, “The Myth of the Superuser: Fear, Risk, and Harm Online,” UC Davis Law Review 41, no. 4 (2008), 1401 [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:20 am
Guest speakers include: David Kappos, Don Rosenberg, John Thorne, Paul Ohm, Bernard Chao, and many others. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:26 pm
The FTC relied on articles such as Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization by Paul Ohm and the Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets by Arvind Narayanan and Vitaly Shmatikov relating to Netflix. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
An important rely to Paul Ohm's reidentification paper [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:26 pm
However, at this now late hour, I remain puzzled about whether we will be forced to use machetes not scalpels, as Paul Ohm very playfully suggests. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:10 am
Allen Ann Bartow Kristin Eschenfelder Edward Felten Brett Frischmann Ian Kerr Jaron Lanier Paul Ohm Hector Postigo Ted Striphas Valerie Steeves Michael Zimmer [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:57 am
Presumably the "single journal article" referenced is Paul Ohm's Broken Promises of Privacy article. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
Obviously, this symposium would not have been possible without its participants–Ken Anderson, Ryan Calo, James Grimmelmann, Sonia Katyal, Ian Kerr, Andrea Matwyshyn, Deborah DeMott, Paul Ohm, Ugo Pagallo, Lawrence Solum, Ramesh Subramanian and Harry Surden–and I thank them all for their responses. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:36 am
There is a terrific lineup, including Ken Anderson, Ryan Calo, James Grimmelmann, Sonia Katyal, Ian Kerr, Andrea Matwyshyn, Deborah DeMott, Paul Ohm, Ugo Pagallo, Ramesh Subramanian and Harry Surden. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:43 am
Participants will include Ken Anderson, Ryan Calo, James Grimmelmann, Sonia Katyal, Ian Kerr, Andrea Matwyshyn, Deborah DeMott, Paul Ohm, Ugo Pagallo, Lawrence Solum, Ramesh Subramanian and Harry Surden. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Allen Ann Bartow Kristin Eschenfelder Edward Felten Ian Kerr Jaron Lanier Paul Ohm Hector Postigo Ted Striphas Valerie Steeves Michael Zimmer In the meanwhile, get your copy of the book and mark your calendars! [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Piece it all Together and You Get 5 Concurring Opinions Blog: Paul Ohm, Jones is a Near-Optimal Result Concurring Opinions Blog: Margot Kaminski, Three thoughts on U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:37 pm
As Ethan recaps and as Paul Ohm indicated (United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:51 am
Tom Goldstein of this blog explains the “odd alignment” of the Court’s two majority opinions in Jones, while Paul Ohm of Freedom to Tinker characterizes the three opinions in the case as a “near-optimal result” for those who argue that Fourth Amendment jurisprudence insufficiently protects privacy in light of new technology. [read post]
