Search for: "People v. Henning" Results 61 - 80 of 448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Over the following decades theSupreme Court continued to recognize the importance of the right to counsel,ultimately concluding in 1984 in Strickland v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm by Alice O'Brien
This court searches for specks of religious discrimination buried in a bureaucracy when deciding whether LGBTQ people have the right to purchase wedding services (Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:20 pm
” The court continued, “[W]hen we studied 15 cases and it looks very much like there’s redundant billing of eight different people who are absolutely helpless [and/or] incompetent, that one phone call seems to have been made that two-tenths of an hour and eight different people got charged for it, if that’s not what happened I really am going to want to know. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
At his retirement in 1952, Chief Justice John Latham (himself a deeply conservative figure and former Opposition Leader) declared (in light of the trouble and controversy that the section had caused lawyers and judges alike) that '[w]hen I die, s. 92 will be found written on my heart': (1952) 85 CLR ix. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: Jordan Rubin reports at Bloomberg Law that “[w]hen he argues this spring at the U.S. [read post]