Search for: "People v. Kim Young" Results 61 - 70 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The conflict is not between princes and people, as it was in the 16th and 17th centuries, but between individual communicators and a multiplicity of laws… What is plainly required is an international agreement to govern communications on the web and, in particular, to determine whether they are to be regulated by an agreed set of supra-national regulations or, if not, to provide a generally acceptable means of deciding which domestic law should apply to any offending publication. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Section on Indian Nations and Indigenous Peoples Breakfast ? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  They also engage in lawfare and have organized political movements from Kim Dotcom’s Internet Party to the Pirate Party. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
Connelly, Jr.Connelly, William F., 1951-Lanham, Md. : Rowman & Littlefield, c2010.Constitutional LawKF4749 .K365 2010To secure the liberty of the people : James Madison's Bill of Rights and the Supreme Court's interpretation / Eric T. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am by Steve Lubet
(As pointed out by The Atlantic's Graeme Wood, the tweet was also racist, as it ridiculed the Korean Kim Jong Un for saying "Donald Tlump. [read post]