Search for: "People v. Smith" Results 61 - 80 of 3,877
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
The case is the most significant elections matter the justices have been forced to confront since the Bush v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Nonetheless, Smith v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Ben Roberts-Smith’s 10-day appeal against a decision dismissing his defamation case over reports in The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald starts on 5 February 2024. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
Website: http://cates1980.wixsite.com/cateswebsite Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/robert.piller.3979  Jeffrey Smith GE SOIL MICROBES NEW TARGET FOR AGRICHEMICAL COMPANIES. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
Courtney Kube and Alexander Smith report for NBC News. [read post]