Search for: "People v Maxwell"
Results 61 - 80
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2008, 10:28 am
This piece charts the old British Catnic/Improver test against its German counterpart, the Schneidmesser test, with some fascinating results.The Kat was also glad to spot a dissertation by a rather younger friend James Tumbridge (Gowlings) on whether the Canadian Supreme Court has anything to teach the British -- with their tiny quantity of case law on famous marks -- on a subject that will not develop much in this country until the Court of Appeal for England and Wales, armed with the ECJ's… [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 10:00 am
People v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 3:56 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 2:42 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 9:40 am
People v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:22 pm
R-1 v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:07 pm
California, 386 U.S. 738 1967; People v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 1:54 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
If you are one of the two people who read last week’s installment, you are already about ninety percent up to speed on this week’s relists and you can stop reading now. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
If you are one of the two people who read last week’s installment, you are already about ninety percent up to speed on this week’s relists and you can stop reading now. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:06 pm
Maxwell, 361 N.J. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
” And last week in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released a decision in Maxwell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
Meanwhile, though it's not taking place till 23 January 2014, the third JIPLP-GRUR Int. event, comparing passing off law with the civil law delict of unfair competition, already has no fewer than 30 people signed up to attend. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
In any event, she'd bet a leaf or two of her favourite catnip that most people on the planet don't even know that there are two Mercks. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
Yes, if the following conditions are met (People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2006, 4:10 am
It is simple to add or amend items and anything posted will appear immediately.The wiki can expand easily if people feel that other areas would be of interest (case law, legislation etc). [read post]
14 May 2007, 1:05 am
Wexler, Maxwell O. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
These are people who have used their financial might with the assistance of some greedy lawyers to stop the truth from getting into the public domain. [read post]
