Search for: "People v. London"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2015, 2:45 am
So, it follows that s 189(1)(c) must contemplate homeless people who would be more vulnerable than many others in the same position. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:51 am
The motion in London-Sire v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
Anyone would in a sense be “vulnerable” when homeless but section 189 sought to identify people with a priority need for accommodation ([[51] and [93]). [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
In the case of David v Hosany [2017] EWHC 2787 (QB), His Honour Judge Moloney QC considered a libel claim brought by the claimant, a Governor of the East London Foundation NHS Trust, in respect of three publications by the defendant, another Governor of the same Trust. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:08 am
Humanitarianism v. the State: Migration as an issue of national security or human security. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:01 am
Reasonable expectations of privacy in voyeurism cases under the Canadian Criminal Code: London’s case of R. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
Austin v London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 It has been a long story for Mr Austin and a long, long, long story for the tolerated trespasser. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
Austin v London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28 It has been a long story for Mr Austin and a long, long, long story for the tolerated trespasser. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 12:31 pm
Does 1-21 (renamed by the Court as "London-Sire v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:09 am
Barker and London-Sire v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
“I had people at a bridge game stop me and ask, ‘How could you have written that opinion? [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 2:09 pm
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
Throughout 2018, new surveillance practices continued to erode the privacy of people in Latin America. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:50 pm
Ahmad, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Newham [2008] EWCA Civ 140 was Newham’s appeal of a JR decision that its allocation scheme was unlawful for failing to take adequate account of cumulative need. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:45 am
There are significant gaps in services addressing the needs of children and young people living with domestic violence in London.2. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
by Maurizio Borghi Patents Court London, 12 January 2012, Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & Nicholas John Houghton. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
Boyejo & Ors, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin) This was the conjoined hearing of an application for Judicial Review of both Barnet and Portsmouth Councils, both JRs bought by Yvonne Hossack and here represented by Stephen Knafler. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 4:12 pm
Boyejo & Ors, R (on the application of) v Barnet London Borough Council [2009] EWHC 3261 (Admin) This was the conjoined hearing of an application for Judicial Review of both Barnet and Portsmouth Councils, both JRs bought by Yvonne Hossack and here represented by Stephen Knafler. [read post]
