Search for: "People v. Payne" Results 61 - 80 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 8:19 am
Similarly, victim impact statements--upheld by a conservative Supreme Court majority in Payne v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
A likelihood of confusion between similar marks is not determined on whether people will be confused between the marks, but rather whether the marks will confuse people into believing that the marks’ goods or services derive from the same origin or sponsorship: Paula Payne Prods. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
A California appellate court will address this question in People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:06 am by Isabel McArdle
There are many people however who believe the scheme is not going far enough to protect children. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
”  Here, the Biden administration agrees to Payne’s request for vacatur, although it opposes Payne’s additional request for further consideration in light of Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am by INFORRM
The exceptional advocacy of the lawyers involved in the case of Indigenous People Maya Kaqchikel from Sumpango v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]