Search for: "People v. Scott (1998)" Results 61 - 80 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
 He dismissed the argument that recoverable success fees and ATE premiums in media cases were a breach of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
The DC Court also noted that the NLRB was not entitled to Chevron deference when it was interpreting the FVRA and neither was the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, whose 1999 interpretation of the 1998 statue coincided with the NLRB ’s views. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am by Martha Ertman
 Likewise, the 1879 Supreme Court case Reynolds v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Finally, where the factual allegations contained in an information "give an accused sufficient notice to prepare a defense and are adequately detailed to prevent a defendant from being tried twice for the same offense, they should be given a fair and not overly restrictive or technical reading" (People v Casey, 95 NY2d 354, 360 [2000]; see also People v Konieczny, 2 NY3d 569 [2004]; People v Jacoby, 304 NY 33, 38-40 [1952];… [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, where the factual allegations contained in an information "give an accused sufficient notice to prepare a defense and are adequately detailed to prevent a defendant from being tried twice for the same offense, they should be given a fair and not overly restrictive or technical reading" (People v Casey, 95 NY2d 354, 360 [2000]; see also People v Konieczny, 2 NY3d 569 [2004]; People v Jacoby, 304 NY 33, 38-40 [1952];… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
In Freedom Bound, it is law that provides the means for instituting empire and its circumscriptions of legal and civic personality, from the beginnings of Spanish and English colonization of the Americas to Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 75 (1954), to which we owe the motion court no special deference. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:13 am by Legal Beagle
The second trial of Mr Fraser came after he successfully appealed his conviction to the UK Supreme Court in London last year : Fraser (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (pdf)The Crown Office released the following statement : Nat Fraser convicted of wife murderNat Fraser was today found guilty of murdering his wife Arlene Fraser in Elgin in April 1998. [read post]