Search for: "Peoples v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner" Results 61 - 80 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm by rainey Reitman
Intro: Mass Surveillance by NSA, GCHQ and Others  The National Security Agency is working to collect as much as possible about the digital lives of people worldwide. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As is customary, I will note that my views are my own, and I am not speaking on behalf of my fellow Commissioners or the staff. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The National Security Bill was read for the first time in the House of Lords. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 12:06 pm
  Of course, people may differ on what these mean even as both business and public administrators battle over details. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”[8]  These principles explain how people are likely to react in the face of a loss, such as a reduction of promised social security benefits. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to Conwell, his first fund raised money from a diverse group of investors via Rule 506(c) of Regulation D and a social media campaign (Rule 506(c) allows for general solicitation in some instances). [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog had a post on the CJEU announcing that judgment will be handed down in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland & Schrems on 16 July 2020. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
In what has become a ritualized performance over the years, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights delivered his statement for the opening of the 32nd session of the U.N. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Violation = go to court, versus administrative solution/privacy commissioner. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd  and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) On April 8, 2014, the European Court of Justice, sitting as the Grand Chamber, delivered its decision in Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C‑293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform, Commissioner of the Garda Síochána, Ireland, The Attorney General. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 12:17 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Yesterday, Wikileaks chose to doxx CIA Director John Brennan and his family, releasing the entirety of his SF-86 security clearance application and all corresponding personal information, including his social security number, his home address, and the addresses of his friends and family. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Bounty was a pregnancy and support club that went into administration in 2020 following an investigation by the Information Commissioner in April 2019, which found that Bounty’s business model was largely based on harvesting data from expectant mothers in order to sell the data on to third parties. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion in Pino v Cardone Capital, LLC that followed the Eleventh Circuit ruling in Wildes v BitConnect, finding that if a person promotes the sale of a security on social media, that person may qualify as a “seller” under Section 12 of the Security Act of 1933. [read post]