Search for: "Public Service Co. v. United Cable"
Results 61 - 80
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Perhaps the government knew a battle was looming, and by blindsiding Apple with an ex parte filing, provided them with a head start in its public relations campaign. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm
– Writing for a unanimous Court in Steel Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Howard E King, The lawyer for Thicke, WIlliams and co-writer rapper TI, said the decision set a "horrible precedent for music and creativity going forward". [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
July 27, 1989); Georgia Television Co. v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom endeavored to answer this question only a little over a month ago.The case in question was Starbucks (HK) Limited and another v British Sky Broadcasting Group PLC and others, which concerned the use of IPTV, or in more simplistic terms, the streaming of TV via the Internet using dedicated hardware to do so, very much like cable TV but in an online environment. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
(Remember when paying for cable television was justified on the basis that you wouldn’t have to see ads?) [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:47 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 6:18 am
Co. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Judge Kimball ruled that Aereo's retransmission of video signals was "indistinguishable from a cable company. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am
Copyright Office attesting to the authenticity of a record or report based on a search of the Office’s records; a type of copyright service available for a fee. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 8:04 am
The case of Conrad v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 6:01 am
In June. the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Supreme Court Rules Against Aereo Place-and-Time-Shifting Technology Case Note by Gordon Firemark On June 25, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated ruling in American Broadcasting Co v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
” But that’s not entirely the case, at least when it comes to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Fox Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
Recently, the United Sates Supreme Court decided American Broadcasting Cos. v Aereo, holding that “Aereo publicly performs copyrighted works, in violation of the Copyright Act’s Transmit Clause, when it sells its subscribers a technologically complex service that allows them to watch television programs over the Internet at about the same time as the programs are broadcast over the air. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:42 pm
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
