Search for: "Rather v. City & County of San Francisco"
Results 61 - 80
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2008, 1:00 pm
&;quot;  The city of San Francisco's lawyers vowed to get opposing papers on file by next week, and presumably NCLR, lead counsel for the private plaintiffs, will do the same. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:00 am
City of Oakland (2023) 89 Cal.App.5th 1226 In the never-ending saga for the City of Oakland (“City”) to retain its professional baseball team after losing the Raiders to Las Vegas and the Warriors to San Francisco, the City proposes to construct a new ballpark and a large adjoining development featuring commercial and residential buildings in the Port of Oakland. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 261. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 9:50 am
As usual, rather than trying the case before the bench itself, the Court picked a Special Master — San Francisco attorney Myles – to recommend a decision on water allocation. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 227 Cal.App.4th 1036, 1054 (2014). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
UPDATE Ministerial Review Ruegg & Ellsworth v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:48 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 2016 WL 4917173 (CA App. 9/15/16)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 10:06 pm
City of San Diego, S238563. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:58 pm
City & County of San Francisco, No. 16-16072 (9th Cir. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 7:13 am
The project started in Sweden and has caught on in cities like New York, San Francisco and Portland. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
County of San Diego (September 28, 2018, case no. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 261, it held the City did not improperly “mitigate into” a categorical exemption by imposing standard construction conditions of approval to address common pedestrian and traffic disruptions in this urban context, and it also applied the deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review to hold that despite the zoning-compliant project’s “unique” setting… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
San Francisco Bay Reg’l Water Quality Control Bd. (2020) 59 Cal.App.5th 199. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
City of South San Francisco (September 18, 2017) 2017 Cal. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
This area along the US-Mexico border abutted border wall work undertaken by SLSCO, a US government contractor operating in the San Diego county area, and Ultimate Concrete, a subcontractor for SLSCO. [read post]
