Search for: "STATE v. SHAFFER"
Results 61 - 80
of 138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 7:22 am
The whistleblowers, Robert Roath, Richard Faucher and Thomas Shaffer, alleged that, from 2007 to 2018, Boeing failed to adhere to agreed upon standards for the fabrication of composite components. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
Justin Shaffer, et al. and BB&T Insurance Services v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:48 am
It is styled, Marcia Slack v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:02 pm
Shaffer, 581 S.W.2d 704, 709 (Tex. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:50 am
Cont’l Airlines, Inc., 164 N.J. 38, 67 (2000) (quoting Shaffer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
” Shaffer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:41 am
The case cite is El Diablo, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
For support, the Cour relied on Shaffer v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:26 pm
Shaffer, 134 Ill. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 12:14 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:24 pm
Department of Justice, DC District Court 12-cv-1441 ABJ, and Shaffer v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am
Even ignoring the foregoing, the complaint’s allegations regarding Liu’s purportedly deceptive acts “are conclusory and factually insufficient” (Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 635-36 [2d Dept 2015] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 3:30 am
., Shaffer v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
"The plaintiff further alleges that it was and still is, the duty of said defendant, to furnish him with maintenance and cure and loss of wages," it states. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
Jackson said the Virginia Supreme Court case of Home Paramount Pest Control Cos. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:23 pm
In Home Paramount Pest Control Cos. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
