Search for: "Stanford v. Stewart"
Results 61 - 68
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 9:58 am
Skepticism and assumptions about impactSkepticism about surveillance impacts like chilling effects is, as noted, is persistent with commentators like Stanford Law’s Michael Sklansky insisting there “little empirical support” for chilling effects associated with surveillance or Leslie Kendrick, of UVA Law, labeling the evidence supporting such claims “flimsy” and calling for more systematic research on point. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
GLICKSMAN Stanford, California: Stanford Economics and Finance, 2011 KF3790 .E27 2011 See Catalog Children -- Legal status, laws, etc. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
Harlan II and Potter Stewart (appointed by Eisenhower), Lewis F. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Harlan II and Potter Stewart (appointed by Eisenhower), Lewis F. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
One of the paradigm examples of “continuity v. change” in The Innovator’s Dilemma, and the example whose aftermath I’ve witnessed for the last 20 years, is the integrated structural steel industry in the US, headquartered in Pittsburgh. [read post]
