Search for: "State v. Burden" Results 61 - 80 of 22,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2025, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” The defendant’s argument constituted “an effort to point out gaps in the plaintiff’s proof, which was insufficient to meet the defendant[‘s] burden as the party moving for summary judgment” (Iannucci v Kucker & Bruh, LLP, 161 AD3d 959, 960; see Kempf v Magida, 116 AD3d at 736). [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Hugh Rennie
The Supreme Court stated, however, that associations could not just “erect a shield against antidiscrimination laws” by claiming to be a burdened expressive group. [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Ordinarily, any content-neutral burden on protected speech must be narrowly tailored to serve a significant state interest, and it must leave open ample alternative means of communication. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:42 am by Samantha M. Cira
FinCEN also stated in its extension notice that it plans to use this time to assess options to further modify CTA reporting deadlines and to initiate a process to revise reporting requirements that will reduce burdens on lower-risk entities. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 7:00 am by James Vann
FinCEN also stated that it intends to initiate a process later in 2025 to revise the reporting requirements to reduce the burden for lower-risk entities. [read post]