Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 61 - 80
of 24,683
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"The party claiming insurance coverage bears the burden of proving entitlement" (New York State Thruway Auth. v Ketco, Inc., 119 AD3d 659, 661; see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"The party claiming insurance coverage bears the burden of proving entitlement" (New York State Thruway Auth. v Ketco, Inc., 119 AD3d 659, 661; see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 8:43 am
(citing United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 6:40 am
Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 2:11 pm
Other States’ Decisions: No Standing to Challenge the Rule Conversely, a federal court in Arkansas determined in States of Tennessee, Arkansas et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
In Dept of State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Department of State et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Department of State et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:51 am
”] From Abitbol v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
The documents included: A denunciation to the Prosecutor General’s Office from Nikolai Ryzhkov, a career security officer and State Duma deputy who has been under U.S. sanctions since Russia’s 2014 invasion of Ukraine. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 am
P.A. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:19 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Palkon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:07 pm
Tobolowsky & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert & Sarah Wicks & Deborah L. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 1:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
