Search for: "State v. Country" Results 61 - 80 of 22,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am by sally
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his home… [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:17 am by EMMY GIBBS, ATLEU
Introduction Judgment of the Supreme Court is handed down today in the case of Janah v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (“SSFCA”) and Libya, and Benkharbouche v SSFCA. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:11 am by sally
Patmalniece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (AIRE Centre intervening) [2011] UKSC 11; [2011] WLR (D) 91 “The conditions for entitlement to state pension credit, which included a requirement that a claimant had a right to reside in the United Kingdom or the Republic of Ireland, constituted indirect discrimination against nationals of other European Union member states which was, however, justified by the legitimate aim of protecting the resources… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix.
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am by sally
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:57 am by Immigration Prof
New York, the challenge to the Trump administration’s plan to exclude people unlawfully in the country from the state-by-state breakdown used to allocate seats in the House.... [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am by Hope Lewis - Guest
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The judgment in NS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] QB 102 did refer to a systemic breach but the CJEU’s focus was on Member States’ awareness of such a breach, rather than the type of breach. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 5:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the materials in Silk v United States: CA8 Opinion Opening Brief US Brief Reply [read post]