Search for: "State v. Stokes" Results 61 - 80 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm by Giles Peaker
Paley v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2022) EWCA Civ 112 This was a second appeal to the Court of Appeal on the issue of whether Waltham Forest had taken to correct approach to assessing the affordability of an offer of a private tenancy in Stoke on Trent in discharge of their housing duty to Ms Paley and her four children (21, 15, 14 and 5). [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:05 am
Again, the text appears to command this perspective, stating in Article VII that the text was written at a particular designated point in historical time, September 17, 1787, and stating in Article V that subsequent amendments become operative as "Part of this Constitution" at the time "when ratified. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Mongolia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 769 (25 July 2007) North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 (25 July 2007) Madan & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 770 (25 July 2007) London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 763 (25 July 2007) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 9:36 am by Randy Barnett
I believe these fears–stoked mainly on the right by the Eagle Forum and the John Birch Society–are overblown. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
Riley involved two decisions of the Alabama Supreme Court, Stokes v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:25 am by Walter Olson
Congress’s enumerated powers don’t extend to making this local bar fight a federal hate crime [Ilya Shapiro on Cato brief in United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 10:55 am by Stephen Wermiel
A number of state legislatures have stoked the debate over abortion rights by annually passing new abortion restrictions or even partial or near-total bans, some clearly designed as vehicles for the court to reconsider Roe. [read post]