Search for: "State v. Whitfield"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 7:11 am
Denying JCI’s motion for summary judgment on the disability discrimination claims under the ADA and state law, the court first addressed whether a three-part test from Frengler v GM, a 2012 unpublished Sixth Circuit case, or a five-part test under Whitfield v Tennessee, a 2011 published decision, applied for purposes of a prima facie case. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:00 am
Bridgeman, associate general counsel, Freddie MacDeborah V. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:51 am
On November 25, 2013, the jury in TQP Development, LLC v. 1-800-Flowers.com, et al., U.S.D.C., E.D. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:54 am
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am
LEXIS 122503, July 30, 2012) and dismissed a claim by a civilly committed atheist that forcing him to participate in various specific sex offender treatment programs violates his free exercise rights and the Establishment Clause.In Whitfield v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version: March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:21 pm
Whitfield's case, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 10:24 am
Whitfield v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:27 am
Mason of Whitfield, Bryson & Mason for this article. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 7:25 am
As the Supreme Court said in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:32 pm
The Whitfield amendment turned this study bill into a substantive bill by indefinitely delaying two major Clean Air Act regulations, the utility MACT rule, which reduces mercury and other toxic emissions from power plants, and the cross-state air pollution rule, which reduces sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants that cross state boundaries and harm downwind communities' efforts to achieve healthy air quality. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:04 pm
" UCS said that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Deck and State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
