Search for: "State v. Alabama Power Co."
Results 61 - 80
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
Alabama Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1194 n.25 (11th Cir. 2007). [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Waithe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
The Court returns to that topic the first week of the term when it hears arguments in No. 12-929, Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:42 am
That was exactly the result reached in a recent decision by United States District Court Judge Ursula Ungaro in Galban v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 4:05 am
Alabama Power Co., 2007 WL 1062769, *24 (11th Cir. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
’ Martin v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
As to them, however, we adhere to our general rule that we don’t do the other side’s research for them.AlabamaThe Alabama Supreme Court held, in E.R. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
Co., 109 Cal. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
Friendly Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Criminal Justice Policy Program at Harvard Law School. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
Renfroe and Co., processing State Farm Katrina claims. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
See Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Three years later, in Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
The complication here is that the VRA’s requirements with which the Arizona commission seems to have, in good faith, been trying to comply have since been deemed by the Supreme Court (in the Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Trump v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 5:39 pm
Central Leather Co., 246 U. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm
Florida Board of Regents, and Alabama v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
