Search for: "State v. Carbone"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 3:17 pm
Development and deployment of carbon capture and sequestration at scale is a necessary component to achieving the United States’ goals on greenhouse gas reduction. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:11 pm
Corey v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
The bill would preempt many state actions to curb carbon pollution. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm
Recall that Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
This past June, in Ohio v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:44 am
Court watchers and environmentalists are waiting with bated breath for the Supreme Court to rule on West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:52 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:34 pm
If Texas got its stay, construction of big carbon emitting sources would be blocked. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:17 am
Carefirst Pregnancy Ctrs., Inc., 334 F.3d at 396; Carbone v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:16 am
-Ed V. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:50 am
Peach State Labs, Inc., Case No. 6:09-CV-395 (M.D. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:24 am
(See Salsman v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 8:39 am
The Texas Supreme Court has requested full briefing for In re Medical Carbon Research Institute, No. 08-0298 (discussed in this post yesterday) and also for BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:05 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Family Opinions Body: AC36353 - Havis-Carbone v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 4:09 am
The United States Chamber of Commerce has come out in support of a bill, HR 6666. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
In United States v. 43.42 Acres of Land, the court examined ownership of a subsurface cavern created by the removal of salt. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Utility Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:25 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
4 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]