Search for: "State v. Coty."
Results 61 - 65
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:42 pm
Coty that a trademark may always be used to “tell the truth” about the identity of the goods and services at issue. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
., Prestonettes v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 10:42 am
Maui Jim, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Lemley: think about mental state and the negligence analogy. [read post]