Search for: "State v. Floyd Worth"
Results 61 - 80
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:00 pm
Under this theory which the Supreme Court addressed in Universal Health Service v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:36 pm
Mr Justice Arnold is on a bit of a winning streak it seems, as last week in Idenix v Gilead [2016] EWCA 1089 the Court of Appeal consisting of Lord Justices Kitchin (giving the lead judgment), Floyd and Patten upheld his decision back in December 2014 (see Kat Darren's post here). [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm
Worth watching if you haven't seen the video yet. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:51 am
So when the New York Times uses Europe as the measure of what is, and can be, permissible speech, one can only be deeply saddened that the litigant who hired Floyd Abrams to win New York Times v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:26 am
In Crystal Fibres v Fianum [2009] EWHC 2149 (Pat) it was described as difficult to construe and apparently quite narrow (per Floyd J as he then was, paragraph 24). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 12:42 pm
Messi’s team, FC Barcelona, is thought to be worth $3.16 billion. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
Floyd J referred the case to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on whether streaming constituted a "communication to the public". [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Harris and KBR v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
From Statement of Floyd Abrams Before the Senate Judiciary Committee at a Hearing Regarding S.J. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
But never mind, it's well worth the read. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
But one of them is worth a mention:- “The passage of time and my change in status. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
The English courts have referred to this mechanism both in the High Court (Floyd J's dicta in Nokia v IPCom) and Birss J when he was sitting in the Patents County Court in relation to copyright cases: "In cases like this the preliminary issue being decided is on a tangible basis. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:05 pm
Welcome, Floyd. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:03 am
" The case is Magness v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
But the winning defendant in EEOC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
Nevertheless, the sole judgment of the Court (given by Lord Clarke) is admirably short and contains a useful statement of the existing principles, and so is well worth a read for commercial practitioners. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
