Search for: "State v. Gratz"
Results 61 - 80
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) (allowing race to be one of several factors to be considered as criteria in college admission, but prohibiting the use of specific quotas). [9] See, e.g., Gratz v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Strickler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am
Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
We affirmed their convictions in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:41 pm
Sebelius and Knox v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
In recent years, the Court granted such immediate review in 2002 in the University of Michigan undergraduate admissions standards case (Gratz v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
This latest stage of the litigation places the constitutional issue front and center.United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Constitution (Gratz v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,416). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
Clancy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Bakke and after Gratz v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
Gratz stated that admission policies that violate the Equal Protection Clause also violate Title VI. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm
(Orin Kerr) In a recently-filed amicus brief submitted by Oracle America Inc. before the en banc Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:03 am
For them, the opacity of holistic review is a virtue, because it allows administrators to engage in what is effectively racial balancing — a practice that the Supreme Court invalidated in Grutter’s companion case, Gratz v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:18 am
(Fisher v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:50 am
In the meantime, John Doe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:45 am
Examples: The brief that was filed by a number of military officers in Gratz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
” Moreover, ten years ago, during an oral argument in yet another affirmative action case, Gratz v. [read post]
