Search for: "State v. Kant"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2011, 1:06 pm
Twombly and Iqbal v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
(For an interesting case on this issue, see the famous US Sixth Court of Appeals decision in Mozert v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Believing international law no longer follows the traditional, interstate Grotian model but, rather, a suprastate model evocative of Kant’s cosmopolitan vision, he looks for practical applications using the comparative approach. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
The action is back around nation-states in a heightened Westphalian competitiveness mode, and I trust that folks at the Pentagon are not so focused on n0n-state actor threats that they have forgotten about the spectre of state-to-state wars, whether the Koreas, China and Taiwan, Pakistan and India, Russia and Georgia among other places, just to name off the nuclear players in this. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Dickson.Chen, Jie, 1955-Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University PressChinaB5233.E55 Z43 2010What is enlightenment : can China answer Kant's question? [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 8:10 pm
.; Citron v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:34 pm
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
Possibly it serves to bring this notion into relief to state it in algebraic terms: if the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B less than PL.United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:55 pm
Part V explores issues that result from the prohibition of prostitution and Part VI proposes an alternative framework to the prohibition of prostitution. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:06 pm
State of IsraelGerd Morgenthaler & Christian Heuser, Die Verfassung der Republik Aserbaidschan - Entwicklungslinien und Perspektiven [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
Second, the limits imposed by Rawls' ideal of public reason do not apply to all actions by the state or even to all coercive uses of state power. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 9:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:02 pm
(That's why I have been delving into Locke, Kant, and Co. in researching my own forthcoming book.) [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
" Mill responds: "It is 'to most persons' in the Slave States of America not a tolerable doctrine that we may sacrifice any portion of the happiness of white men for the sake of a greater amount of happiness to black men. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 10:15 am
Rylands' conduct in the famous case of Rylands v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
Rylands' conduct in the famous case of Rylands v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 6:34 pm
Notice Kant's use of the phrase is, in a sense, diametrically opposed to Hobbes'. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Here's a taste: Paul Davies, a cosmologist at Arizona State University and author of popular science books. . .asserted in [a New York Times op-ed piece] that science, not unlike religion, rested on faith, not in God but in the idea of an orderly universe. [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 7:28 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 10:35 pm
Part V shows the existence of universals in the human mind, which destroys the strong moral relativism underlying postmodernism. [read post]
