Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 61 - 80 of 6,792
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, as plaintiffs facts alleging extortion do not state a claim, so too are plaintiff’s claims that the Schutzer defendants submitted a forged document insufficient to state a claim. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 4:20 am by Patricia Hughes
(Report, p.82) It seems “many” students were in first year and looking to establish connections with other students and therefore when asked to sign the letter saw this as a means to accomplish that, without thinking too much about consequences (Report, p.85). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Benson Varghese
You may need to file a new Form W-4 with your employer to adjust your withholding (IRC § 3402(f)(2)(B)). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Benson Varghese
You may need to file a new Form W-4 with your employer to adjust your withholding (IRC § 3402(f)(2)(B)). [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 8:08 am by Benson Varghese
You may need to file a new Form W-4 with your employer to adjust your withholding (IRC § 3402(f)(2)(B)). [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Dukarm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 6:05 am by Just Security
United States by Marty Lederman (@marty_lederman), Mary B. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Re (b), as Vile notes, larger population states are extremely unlikely to issue calls for a convention if there is no apportionment of voting power to state populations within the enabling law (p.121). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Co. v Legend Abstract Corp., 171 AD3d 705, 706 [2d Dept 2019]; Shon v State of New York, 75 AD3d 1035, 1038 [3d Dept 2010]).Footnote 3: Claimant's contention that the taking of the depositions of his medical experts telephonically was improper (see CPLR 3115 [b]) was waived by his failure to object at the time that the depositions were taken (see CPLR 3115 [b]; Matter of Washington v Montefiore Hosp., 7 AD3d 945,… [read post]