Search for: "State v. Parris"
Results 61 - 80
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm
(Chronicle of Higher Education, “Two Universities Under the Legal Gun”by Marc Parry and Jennifer Howard, May 29, 2011 and Chronicle of Higher Education “What’s at Stake in the Georgia State Copyright Case” May 30, 2011 Experts”Kevin L. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
” Authors Marc Parry and Jeffrey R. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Parry & Ors was heard on Thursday 31 October. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors, heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Sullivan parries, by reminding Griffith of Walton’s unqualified conclusion that Suleiman was simply “part of” the Taliban. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm
In Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 12:04 am
People v Wlasiuk ; 2011 NY Slip Op 09544 ; Decided on December 29, 2011 ; Appellate Division, Third Department reads like one. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:48 am
(These cases, including Ramirez v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
Beech, [1920] 1 Ch. 40, at p. 44, quoted in Re Parry, Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:00 am
In Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Carvin parried that if one was looking for information about who should get a tax credit (the form of the subsidy at issue), then the natural place to look would be in the tax code, and not in the title of the U.S. code relating to public health and exchanges. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
To state a claim under the California Voting Rights Act, you've got to establish "dilution" -- which in turn means that you've got to show that a particular district would be "majority-minority" (over 50%) to prevail. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm
After those discussions, the clause in the 1993 contract stated that the association granted Clark (emphasis added): “eight (8) additional, consecutive, exclusive and irrevocable options to acquire the exclusive right to produce a live television broadcast of and to produce on tape or film the Awards for each of the years 1998 through and including 2005, and for any extensions, renewals, substitutions or modifications of the NBC Agreement . . . . [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 2:44 am
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Parry & Ors. heard 31 October 2019. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:26 pm
Bucklew v. [read post]
