Search for: "State v. Phelan"
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2018, 10:32 am
Pereira v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:36 am
Happily, the government now gets a second bite at the Brady apple.United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Phelan, Kimberly P. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
Phelan, 419 F.3d 259, 263 (3d Cir. 2005) (citing Barnhart v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:50 am
The lawyers in Elouise Cobell v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
JOHN THOMAS PHELAN, JR., Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The roadmap expressly states it is not a guide to future compliance, but rather an information document setting out Ofcom’s present thinking. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm
v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:02 pm
Blumenthal): 202-224-2823Andrew Phelan (Rep. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
Of course, we still await Justice Phelan's ruling on Phase I of Access Copyright's litigation against York University (oral arguments completed in June, 2016) - in which York's fair dealing guidelines were put on trial. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:42 am
Of course, we still await Justice Phelan's ruling on Phase I of Access Copyright's litigation against York University (oral arguments completed in June, 2016) - in which York's fair dealing guidelines were put on trial. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
A sizeable estate permits adequate compensation, but nothing beyond that (Martin v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 5:01 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
York & York v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10 (1948), described as “a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile,” and in Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 9:01 pm
The Ruling in Judicial Watch v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Phelan, 333 U.S. 6, 10 (1948), described as “a drastic measure and at times the equivalent of banishment or exile,” and in Ng Fung Ho v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:00 pm
In a recent ruling, Durham v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
The FCA states that:[19] It is not disputed that if Circum’s calculations had been accepted, this would represent a sizeable increase in the royalties to be paid to Access, which it estimates to represent approximately $500,000.00 per year, or $3 million dollars over the two tariff periods. [read post]
